Re: Annoying Reply-To

Hulou hjuvat folkenbergers und goody good peoples ute po daer in allas e
oceanos / terranos,

I chose to 'Reply to Mailing-List' in my preferred mail app. (Kmail on Ubuntu
8.10) I really don't know why ... but shore hope, mean sure, as in truly, this
is hopefully not an annoying postage broadcastung. wink, lol, capatcha,
tsajajaja, manolito!

Furthermore, I am pop to(a)sting. Phonetically reversed, top posting.

Puff the embers every once and a while. To have [a] flame[s] --help?.

Keep on keepin' on.

SamiTjahkasTjohkasny, äeeäee kenen poro, Vincentin Genen? Simmons? Gruppa?
Gene? Ootsiäee ihan varma? Oks sähöstarttii, ahe! Läks, where's mi head
(laughing it off)?

Focus. "Remember, there's a big difference between kneeling down and bending
over."
-- great late FZ --

Wha'ever dad means, I think we need some standards.

1. I wish

2. I had a button that kept me from sending silly messages.

3. Whoops, still not do.

Rock,

Aarni

Received: from mx2.hub.org ([200.46.204.254]:26819 "EHLO mx2.hub.org")
by northstar.iwn.fi with ESMTP id S10843AbYJWU4D (ORCPT
<rfc822;aarni(at)kymi(dot)com>); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:56:03 +0300
Received: from postgresql.org (unknown [200.46.204.86])
by mx2.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEDA1E8229B;
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:55:49 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B161764FD71
for <pgsql-general-postgresql(dot)org(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:54:47
-0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 73727-01-4 for <pgsql-general-postgresql(dot)org(at)postgresql(dot)org>;
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:54:44 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com
[209.85.198.231])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301A164FD93
for <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:54:42 -0300 (ADT)
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so482917rvf.43
for <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:54:41 -0700
(PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
bh=7Asrle/2g7OnvL+HaGS+X0l8PHMMoueNpeFTF88Jfzs=;
b=cyRbNr15f00Tbu7laTnSM9nSmJhkwnqBa04eGgWN7AV9nfxSEqrCM0EhMiy0ZFPec1
PzBioeul06+v2CNCD7LDc3KiTHky2DliiA7gYedUtJcW6UJtjbeqo1CxBqEA/sM47FHO
fHmhUNIJ9nh5tnfI4SejEiDdht1mgmGsdbFDM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
:references;
b=UIdt6g6DfV7h1z9tYcTxlUF90IFoeN6iAAH6GHrzWsp5VpluWUEIVgsZloJkDcIFeh
ffuxRD9Ucq2bPWcnk2flEeLbyCQwOvDsiU5WR24JGYF5LAPugouNEKW5xeLAOnN5JA8/
V7/aUnJMkdkdCNxpLyGBxCUsJcbVKgGDdyaN0=
Received: by 10.141.162.16 with SMTP id p16mr661554rvo.243.1224795281837;
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.141.77.14 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4cba5adc0810231354u68a72c8fw42a03d4603a95b29(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:54:41 +0200
From: "Dave Coventry" <dgcoventry(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Steve Atkins" <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Annoying Reply-To
Cc: "pgsql-general General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
In-Reply-To: <3A121E4F-3C3A-4CC0-86B6-3AF4D78D7BA4(at)blighty(dot)com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <200810231701(dot)m9NH1ML21995(at)momjian(dot)us>
<200810232009(dot)04806(dot)clist(at)uah(dot)es> <4900C30A(dot)8030604(at)kkmfg(dot)com>
<200810232046(dot)54731(dot)clist(at)uah(dot)es> <4900CA27(dot)6060800(at)kkmfg(dot)com>
<3A121E4F-3C3A-4CC0-86B6-3AF4D78D7BA4(at)blighty(dot)com>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none
X-Spam-Level:
X-Mailing-List: pgsql-general
List-Archive: <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general>
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org?body=help>
List-ID: <pgsql-general.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org?body=sub%20pgsql-general>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org?body=unsub%20pgsql-general>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Return-Path: <pgsql-general-owner+M139303(at)postgresql(dot)org>
X-Envelope-To: <kymimail(at)iwn(dot)fi> (uid 0)
X-Orcpt: rfc822;aarni(at)kymi(dot)com
Original-Recipient: rfc822;aarni(at)kymi(dot)com
Status: R
X-Status: N
X-KMail-EncryptionState:
X-KMail-SignatureState:
X-KMail-MDN-Sent:

On Thursday 23 October 2008 23:54:41 Dave Coventry wrote:
> 2008/10/23 Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>:
> > If you don't like it (and this applies to everyone else arguing about it,
> > on either side) please do one of these three things:
> >
> > 1. "Fix" it locally at your end, as is trivial to do with procmail,
> > amongst other approaches, and quit whining about it.
> >
> > or
> >
> > 2. Quit whining about it.
> >
> > or
> >
> > 3. Find somewhere else to whine about it and quit whining about it here.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Steve
> >
> > On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Bill Moran wrote:
> > > You can resent it or not, but this _is_ a personal thing. It's
> > > personal because you are the only one complaining about it. Despite
> > > the large number of people on this list, I don't see anyone jumping in
> > > to defend you.
>
> Personally I am of the view that, as I am on this list principally to
> get support from it, and I am quite prepared to submit to the vagaries
> and oddities of the list behaviour in pursuit of the answers I might
> seek.
>
> As such, I am quite prepared to 1) Fix it my end, 2) Quit whining
> about it and 3) Find something else to whine about.
>
> However, the point is made by Bill that 'only one person' might feel
> that the reply-to configuration could be improved, and I feel
> compelled to say that, while I might not be driven to complain about
> the list behaviour myself, I do feel that the OP does have a point.
>
> And that's all that I'm going to say on the matter.
>
> - Dave Coventry