| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SSL cleanups/hostname verification |
| Date: | 2008-10-23 20:23:16 |
| Message-ID: | 200810232023.m9NKNGb14504@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Attached patch cleans up the certificate verification in libpq, and adds
> a configuration paraqmeter to control it. The new parameter is
> "sslverify", and can be set to:
Because SSL offers both encryption and authentication, I wonder if we
should call this "sslauthenticate".
> * cn = default = will validate that the certificate chains to a trusted
> root, *and* that the cn on the certificate matches the hostname
> specificed in the connection. This is the only option that prevents
> man-in-the-middle attacks completely, and therefor is the default.
Should this be "commonname"?
> * cert = what we had before if there was a root certificate file = will
> validate that the certificate chains to a trusted root, but ignore the cn.
Should this be "chain"?
> * none = will disable certificate validation completely
>
>
> This means that the connection string is now in charge of the security
> policy, and not just the "if file exists or not". IMHO this is the only
> proper way to do it. Now, if you for some reason loose the root
Agreed.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2008-10-23 20:28:31 | Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple? |
| Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2008-10-23 19:59:56 | Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple? |