Re: Unicode escapes in literals

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unicode escapes in literals
Date: 2008-10-23 16:21:49
Message-ID: 20081023162148.GG3413@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 06:04:43PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Man that's ugly. Why the ampersand?
>
> Yeah, excellent question. It seems completely unnecessary, but it is
> surely there in the syntax diagram.

Probably because many Unicode representations are done with "U+"
followed by 4-6 hexadecimal units, but "+" is problematic for other
reasons (in some vendor's implementation)?

A

--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2008-10-23 16:41:44 Re: double-buffering page writes
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2008-10-23 16:21:48 Re: Block level concurrency during recovery