Re: Annoying Reply-To

On Thursday 23 October 2008, Collin Kidder <adderd(at)kkmfg(dot)com> wrote:
> You must use Reply All. You
> might say that that makes Thunderbird crippled but I see it more as a
> sign that nobody outside of a few fussy RFC worshipping types would ever
> want the behavior of the Postgre list. Yes, I'll have to live with the
> current behavior. Yes, it's an RFC standard. But, even after having
> heard the arguments I'm not convinced that this list's behavior is
> desirable. YMMV.

If it bugs you that much, just fix it for yourself.

:0 fr
* ^(To:|Cc:)(dot)*pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org(dot)*
| /usr/bin/formail -I "Reply-To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org"

.. and eliminate any dupes:

:0 Whc: /home/$USER/.msgid.lock
|/usr/bin/formail -D 1024 /home/$USER/.msgid.cache

If your MUA doesn't work right, procmail is your friend.

--
Alan