| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Joshua Kramer <josh(at)globalherald(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: SEPostgres - on track for 8.4? |
| Date: | 2008-10-23 00:32:19 |
| Message-ID: | 200810222032.20189.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wednesday 22 October 2008 12:14:12 Josh Berkus wrote:
> Joshua Kramer wrote:
> > Howdy Folks,
> >
> > I notice that several SELinux patches have been submitted in the
> > CommitFest targeting Nov 1 for 8.4. Is this on track for implementation
> > in Postgres core by 8.4?
>
> Still under discussion. The idea is to get it merged for 8.4, *but*
> there's three critical areas that need help:
>
> 1) making row-based permissions which is exposed to the SQL command line
> and works even without SELinux.
>
> 2) coming up with some acceptable algorithm in which FKs can work with
> row-based-permissions which can be improved in the future without
> breaking backwards compatibility.
>
> 3) detailed checking of the current implementation of SEPostgres against
> the Common Criteria requirements by someone who speaks "security tech".
>
> So, anyone who wants this patch, **we need your help** in making it happen.
>
> Also, as you can see, PostgreSQL is not about "good enough" but about
> "as good as we can reasonably do". I think generally that since we're
> releasing once a year, every year, holding off on a patch for one
> version to make it "near perfect" is probably a good strategy ... as
> much as it pains me to wait.
>
> Current status of SEPostgres patch: hopeful, but not assured.
>
Someone mentioned to me that IBM and Oracle have several patents in this area,
is anyone looking into that angle?
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2008-10-23 17:08:00 | Re: SEPostgres - on track for 8.4? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-10-22 16:14:12 | Re: SEPostgres - on track for 8.4? |