Re: Annoying Reply-To

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>
Cc: Mikkel Høgh <mikkel(at)hoegh(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Annoying Reply-To
Date: 2008-10-17 12:56:34
Message-ID: 20081017125634.GK4452@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

* Bill Moran (wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com) wrote:
> You can resent it or not, but this _is_ a personal thing. It's personal
> because you are the only one complaining about it. Despite the large
> number of people on this list, I don't see anyone jumping in to defend
> you.

Ugh. No one else is jumping in simply because we've already been
through all of this and it hasn't and isn't going to change. The PG
lists are the odd ones out here, not the other way around, I assure you.
One might compare it to our continued use of CVS. It's wrong and
backwards and all that, but most of the PG community is used to it and
changing is a pain. shrug.

Enjoy,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2008-10-17 13:27:46 Re: Annoying Reply-To
Previous Message Bill Moran 2008-10-17 12:49:17 Re: Annoying Reply-To

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2008-10-17 13:27:46 Re: Annoying Reply-To
Previous Message Bill Moran 2008-10-17 12:49:17 Re: Annoying Reply-To