Re: Annoying Reply-To

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Annoying Reply-To
Date: 2008-10-17 12:42:46
Message-ID: 20081017124245.GA7198@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 01:02:57PM +0200, Mikkel Høgh wrote:
> Yay, even more manual labour instead of having the computers doing the work
> for us. What's your next suggestion, go back to pen and paper?

My suggestion would be to use a mail user agent that knows how to read
the list headers, which were standardized many years ago. Then you
"reply to list". Mutt has done this for at least a few years now. I
don't know about other MUAs.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bill Moran 2008-10-17 12:49:17 Re: Annoying Reply-To
Previous Message Mikkel Høgh 2008-10-17 12:33:04 Re: Annoying Reply-To

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bill Moran 2008-10-17 12:49:17 Re: Annoying Reply-To
Previous Message Mikkel Høgh 2008-10-17 12:33:04 Re: Annoying Reply-To