| From: | "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Are projected queries optimized like nonprojected ones | 
| Date: | 2008-10-16 11:55:29 | 
| Message-ID: | 20081016115529.GG25000@a-kretschmer.de | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
am  Thu, dem 16.10.2008, um 14:43:42 +0300 mailte Andrus folgendes:
> I'm looking a hint for new application dynamic query builder creation for 
> PostgreSQL 8.0+
> 
> Following two queries return same results:
> 
> SELECT ...
> FROM t1 JOIN t2 USING (cx)
> LEFT JOIN t3 USING (cy)
> LEFT JOIN t4 USING (cz)
> WHERE ...
> 
> and
> 
> SELECT ...
> FROM (SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN t2 USING (cx) LEFT JOIN t3 USING (cy) WHERE 
> ... ) p1
> LEFT JOIN t4 USING (cz)
> WHERE ...
> 
> Second query is easier to generate but contains two where clauses which 
> produce logically same resultset and in first query.
> So it is preferable to use second form. However I'm not clear how this 
> affects query perfomance.
> 
> Questions:
> 
> Will execution speed of both queries be the same ?
> Will 8.0+ optimizers create same execution plan for those queries ?
You can check this with EXPLAIN ANALYSE <your_query>. I'm guessing it
depends on the PG-Version, recent versions are smarter.
Andreas
-- 
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt:  Heynitz: 035242/47150,   D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
GnuPG-ID:   0x3FFF606C, privat 0x7F4584DA   http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-16 12:17:50 | Re: Problems with Timezones in Australia | 
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-16 11:55:22 | Re: PQescapestringConn not found in libpq.dll |