From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tony Marston <tony(at)marston-home(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>, 'Peter Eisentraut' <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #4465: GROUP BY is not to SQL standard |
Date: | 2008-10-15 15:57:14 |
Message-ID: | 20081015155714.GC18271@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 08:28:42PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tony Marston wrote:
> > I think your definition of "Feature T301 Functional Dependencies"
> > is extremely questionable. [et cetæra, ad nauseam]
>
> The issue is that Postgres is _more_ standards-compliant than MySQL,
> but Postgres is not 100% compliant either. Is any database system
> 100% compliant?
No.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rodriguez Fernando | 2008-10-15 17:20:05 | Re: Postgres database problem |
Previous Message | Julien Vadnais | 2008-10-15 15:50:48 | BUG #4481: Big text insert/update using functions failed |