Re: Is autovacuum too noisy about orphan temp tables?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is autovacuum too noisy about orphan temp tables?
Date: 2008-10-14 21:04:46
Message-ID: 20081014210446.GD3905@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:

> > Standard DBAs are blind to LOG level messages.
>
> Indeed, which is why I'm not too concerned about Heikki's complaint.

Well, if the disk fills up due to excessive LOG entries, they won't be
so blind. I think just adding the HINT is good enough.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2008-10-14 21:11:48 Re: spoonbill is failing citext test
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-10-14 21:01:38 Re: Is autovacuum too noisy about orphan temp tables?