From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Fernando Moreno <azazel(dot)7(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: db_user_namespace, md5 and changing passwords |
Date: | 2008-10-05 17:37:50 |
Message-ID: | 20081005173750.GB4266@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane escribió:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I don't know of a way to make MD5 and db_user_namespace work cleanly so
> > we are considering removing db_user_namespace in 8.4.
>
> We are? It's no more or less ugly than the day it was put in (the
> MD5 encryption option was already there).
>
> If we had some improved replacement to offer, I'd be all for getting
> rid of db_user_namespace; but without that I think we're just taking
> away a feature that some people are using. At least, the argument
> was made back in 2002 that people would use this if they had it;
> do we have evidence to the contrary now?
I also disagree with removing it. I know some people (few and far
apart) are using it.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrus | 2008-10-05 19:32:14 | Using subquery or creating temp table |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-05 15:02:44 | Re: db_user_namespace, md5 and changing passwords |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-10-05 18:51:10 | Re: Subtransaction commits and Hot Standby |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-05 16:33:18 | new int8 test still has problems |