Re: db_user_namespace, md5 and changing passwords

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Fernando Moreno <azazel(dot)7(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: db_user_namespace, md5 and changing passwords
Date: 2008-10-05 17:37:50
Message-ID: 20081005173750.GB4266@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane escribió:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I don't know of a way to make MD5 and db_user_namespace work cleanly so
> > we are considering removing db_user_namespace in 8.4.
>
> We are? It's no more or less ugly than the day it was put in (the
> MD5 encryption option was already there).
>
> If we had some improved replacement to offer, I'd be all for getting
> rid of db_user_namespace; but without that I think we're just taking
> away a feature that some people are using. At least, the argument
> was made back in 2002 that people would use this if they had it;
> do we have evidence to the contrary now?

I also disagree with removing it. I know some people (few and far
apart) are using it.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrus 2008-10-05 19:32:14 Using subquery or creating temp table
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-10-05 15:02:44 Re: db_user_namespace, md5 and changing passwords

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-10-05 18:51:10 Re: Subtransaction commits and Hot Standby
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-10-05 16:33:18 new int8 test still has problems