From: | ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: NDirectFileRead and Write |
Date: | 2008-09-16 01:56:29 |
Message-ID: | 20080916104812.7E68.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Here is a revised patch to renewal NDirectFileRead/Write.
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > * Let's rename them BufFileReadCount and BufFileWriteCount to reflect
> > their actual purpose.
> > * In any case I agree that the current arrangement
> > with execdebug.h declaring variables defined in bufmgr.c is just weird.
- NDirectFile{Read|Write} are renamed to BufFile{Read|Write}Count.
- They are still declared in execdebug.h and buffile.c includes it.
I did not touch messages in ShowBufferUsage() in the patch.
I think it still has meaning because BufFile counters are
kinds of direct block access.
> ShowBufferUsage()
> ! Shared blocks: ...
> ! Local blocks: ...
> ! Direct blocks: <R> read, <W> written
Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
BufFileCount.patch | application/octet-stream | 3.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-09-16 02:40:33 | Re: plpgsql is not translate-aware |
Previous Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2008-09-16 01:32:11 | Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep) |