| From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Postgres General List" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Oracle and Postgresql |
| Date: | 2008-09-15 15:54:44 |
| Message-ID: | 20080915115444.65ab0c4d.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-www |
In response to "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Jonathan Bond-Caron <jbondc(at)openmv(dot)com> wrote:
> > For me, "Oracle stored procedures can be encrypted." is a very real and
> > valuable argument.
> > It would certainly be a valuable feature in pgsql (in the enterprise space).
>
> I don't see how that's any more effective than writing your stored
> procs in C in postgresql.
Perhaps the fact that the implementation time/effort for a C procedure
is something on the order of 10x that for a pl/pgsql procedure?
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | aravind chandu | 2008-09-15 16:00:03 | Security issue for postgresql |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-09-15 15:48:47 | Re: Oracle and Postgresql |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-09-15 15:55:39 | Re: Mailserver/Majordomo problem |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-09-15 15:48:47 | Re: Oracle and Postgresql |