From: | Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | Jonathan Bond-Caron <jbondc(at)openmv(dot)com>, "'Harald Armin Massa'" <haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com>, "'Postgres General List'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Oracle and Postgresql |
Date: | 2008-09-15 17:12:08 |
Message-ID: | 20080915101208.5c43bd97@jd-laptop |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-www |
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:06:08 -0700
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> > > As long as the disease of "Intellectual property" is running
> > > around, that "I can encrypt my code" will provide some felt
> > > benefit for PHBs....
> >
> > I have to disagree here. Encrypting stored procedures is not just
> > about forcing customers to pay software maintenance.
>
> Please to explain how you imagine this to be so.
>
> > For us, it's about *protecting hard work and intellectual property*.
>
> Yes, and of course nobody else does "hard work" either. Don't you
> mean you're "protecting" this stuff by forcing people to pay for it?
Are we going to start a VI vs Emacs argument too?
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2008-09-15 17:20:47 | Re: [LIKELY_SPAM]Re: Oracle and Postgresql |
Previous Message | Martin Gainty | 2008-09-15 17:10:42 | Re: Oracle and Postgresql |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2008-09-15 17:20:47 | Re: [LIKELY_SPAM]Re: Oracle and Postgresql |
Previous Message | Martin Gainty | 2008-09-15 17:10:42 | Re: Oracle and Postgresql |