| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Better auth errors from libpq |
| Date: | 2008-09-12 03:52:58 |
| Message-ID: | 20080912035258.GJ9856@fetter.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:28:36PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > I think something like:
>
> > psql: FATAL: Ident authentication failed for user "root"
> > HINT: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/client-authentication.html
>
> > Would be nice.
>
> Do you really think that's helpful in the typical case where someone
> fat-fingered their password?
>
> I'm not averse to hint messages that are actually helpful, ie,
> reasonably connected to the *specific* failure situation. The problem
> I've got with David's proposal is that it provides a one-size-fits-all
> hint for every possible auth failure. One size does not fit all here.
Here's a few different sizes: one for each auth method.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| hint.diff | text/plain | 4.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-09-12 05:38:31 | Re: Better auth errors from libpq |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2008-09-12 03:34:26 | Re: Better auth errors from libpq |