From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Choosing a filesystem |
Date: | 2008-09-11 17:07:26 |
Message-ID: | 20080911170725.GL1008@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 06:29:36PM +0200, Laszlo Nagy wrote:
> The expert told me to use RAID 5 but I'm hesitating. I think that RAID 1+0
> would be much faster, and I/O performance is what I really need.
I think you're right. I think it's a big mistake to use RAID 5 in a
database server where you're hoping for reasonable write performance.
In theory RAID 5 ought to be fast for reads, but I've never seen it
work that way.
> I would like to put the WAL file on the SAS disks to improve performance,
> and create one big RAID 1+0 disk for the data directory. But maybe I'm
> completely wrong. Can you please advise how to create logical partitions?
I would listen to yourself before you listen to the expert. You sound
right to me :)
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matthew Wakeling | 2008-09-11 17:18:37 | Re: Choosing a filesystem |
Previous Message | Laszlo Nagy | 2008-09-11 16:29:36 | Choosing a filesystem |