Re: "Healing" a table after massive updates

In response to "Gauthier, Dave" <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com>:

> I might be able to answer my own question...
>
> vacuum FULL (analyze is optional)

CLUSTER _may_ be a better choice, but carefully read the docs regarding
it's drawbacks first. You may want to do some benchmarks to see if it's
really needed before you commit to it as a scheduled operation.

--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/

wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023

****************************************************************
IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is
intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this
message is not an intended recipient (or the individual
responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended
recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received
this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or
error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The
sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or
omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a
result of e-mail transmission.
****************************************************************