From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Move src/tools/backend/ to wiki |
Date: | 2008-09-08 22:24:11 |
Message-ID: | 200809082224.m88MOBw02244@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> So I just noticed that we have a description of the Pg innards in the
> sourcecode, complete with a flowchart and all, at src/tools/backend.
> I had already seen this graph years ago; what shocked me the most was
> finding out that there's a pointer to it in the Developer's FAQ, in a
> question that's absolutely unrelated to it.
>
> So I went ahead and moved its mention to a separate question, where it
> has a lot more visibility. (I also added an URL to anoncvs, where
> people can see it more readily.)
>
> What I'm wondering right now is what's the value of having this stuff
> in the source code at all. Why don't we move it to the Wiki and remove
> it from the repo? Would anybody object to that idea? Having it on CVS
> means that nobody is able to improve the text, which is kind of sad
> because it's been neglected for the last 3 years.
I have no problem having it moved to the wiki, though it does have
HTML imagemap elements. I don't think much changes at the flow chart
level from release to release so it would fine if it was just CVS HEAD.
I also don't think many people do back-branch development.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Markus Wanner | 2008-09-08 22:52:02 | Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-09-08 22:17:31 | Re: Prototype: In-place upgrade v02 |