Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)oryx(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, gavin(at)alcove(dot)com(dot)au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql
Date: 2008-09-06 21:19:20
Message-ID: 200809062119.m86LJKH19203@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> ... I changed
> >> the exit code to PSQL_CMD_NEWEDIT instead of PSQL_CMD_SEND, which causes
> >> the command to wait in the query buffer.
>
> > The principle of least astonishment suggests that \ef should behave in
> > the same way as \e.
>
> Quite.

So, are they consistent now or do we need another patch?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-09-06 22:21:01 Re: [HACKERS] TODO item: Implement Boyer-Moore searching (First time hacker)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-09-06 21:13:26 About that CommitFest redirect page ...