Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Asko Oja <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql
Date: 2008-09-05 21:09:44
Message-ID: 200809052109.m85L9iv28256@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gregory Stark wrote:
> I wonder if it's worth keeping two variants at all really. Why not just make
> psql's native table formatting exactly ReST? Is there any part of it that we
> don't like as much as our existing tables?

It doubles the number of display lines; a very obvious shortcoming.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-09-05 21:22:46 Re: Need more reviewers!
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-09-05 21:07:29 pgsql: Fix an oversight in the 8.2 patch that improved mergejoin