From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | w^3 <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | categorizing mailing lists |
Date: | 2008-09-02 14:34:21 |
Message-ID: | 20080902143421.GE12610@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Selena Deckelmann escribió:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > The previous version was using the Description field (or a transcription
> > thereof), but for all other lists it can be a long text.
> >
> > Should we add a "short description" column to the database?
>
> Please.
Okay, so I had a look at this and this is my conclusion: pgus-general
and pgeu-general are in the wrong category. I was just talking to
Stefan:
(10:27:05) alvherre(at)pg: so here's what I want to do
(10:27:10) alvherre(at)pg: I need a new column in the lists table
(10:27:13) alvherre(at)pg: which is a short description
(10:27:21) alvherre(at)pg: that text is what I would put in the left-side menu
(10:27:40) alvherre(at)pg: it is pretty obvious that in "user groups" I can just name the geographical region
(10:27:48) alvherre(at)pg: and in regional lists, I can name the language
(10:27:59) alvherre(at)pg: but I cannot do sh*t about pgus and pgeu :-(
(10:28:13) alvherre(at)pg: maybe we should create another category for those??
What do people think about creating a new category (list group) and
sticking pgus-general and pgeu-general on it? What should that category
be named?
Also, I take it nobody objects to the "short description" thing.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua Drake | 2008-09-02 16:31:27 | Re: categorizing mailing lists |
Previous Message | Michael Nolan | 2008-09-01 23:09:24 | Re: Oracle and Postgresql |