categorizing mailing lists

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: w^3 <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: categorizing mailing lists
Date: 2008-09-02 14:34:21
Message-ID: 20080902143421.GE12610@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Selena Deckelmann escribió:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> > The previous version was using the Description field (or a transcription
> > thereof), but for all other lists it can be a long text.
> >
> > Should we add a "short description" column to the database?
>
> Please.

Okay, so I had a look at this and this is my conclusion: pgus-general
and pgeu-general are in the wrong category. I was just talking to
Stefan:

(10:27:05) alvherre(at)pg: so here's what I want to do
(10:27:10) alvherre(at)pg: I need a new column in the lists table
(10:27:13) alvherre(at)pg: which is a short description
(10:27:21) alvherre(at)pg: that text is what I would put in the left-side menu
(10:27:40) alvherre(at)pg: it is pretty obvious that in "user groups" I can just name the geographical region
(10:27:48) alvherre(at)pg: and in regional lists, I can name the language
(10:27:59) alvherre(at)pg: but I cannot do sh*t about pgus and pgeu :-(
(10:28:13) alvherre(at)pg: maybe we should create another category for those??

What do people think about creating a new category (list group) and
sticking pgus-general and pgeu-general on it? What should that category
be named?

Also, I take it nobody objects to the "short description" thing.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua Drake 2008-09-02 16:31:27 Re: categorizing mailing lists
Previous Message Michael Nolan 2008-09-01 23:09:24 Re: Oracle and Postgresql