From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Guy Rouillier <guyr-ml1(at)burntmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Oracle and Postgresql |
Date: | 2008-09-01 03:44:41 |
Message-ID: | 20080901034441.GJ3717@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-www |
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 10:44:38PM -0400, Guy Rouillier wrote:
> M2Y wrote:
>>
>> Why most enterprises prefer Oracle than Postgres even though it is
>> free and has a decent enough user community.
>
> Databases are a critical part of many companies' business. I work
> for telecom company, and if we were to lose our databases, we'd be
> out of business, period. So, "free and decent enough" are not good
> enough. If you are going to bet your business on anything, you
> want to be as sure as possible that "it" is reliable and that you
> can expect quick action if "it" should break.
What they want to have is a huge entity they can blame when everything
goes wrong. They're not interested in the actual response times or
even in the much more important time-to-fix because once they've
blamed Oracle, they know the responsibility is no longer on their
shoulders.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yi Zhao | 2008-09-01 04:05:08 | why my delete command blocked.... |
Previous Message | Uwe C. Schroeder | 2008-09-01 03:43:12 | Re: Oracle and Postgresql |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yi Zhao | 2008-09-01 04:05:08 | why my delete command blocked.... |
Previous Message | Uwe C. Schroeder | 2008-09-01 03:43:12 | Re: Oracle and Postgresql |