From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Matthew Dennis <mdennis(at)merfer(dot)net> |
Cc: | Christophe <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>, PGSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: indexes on functions and create or replace function |
Date: | 2008-08-29 02:41:20 |
Message-ID: | 20080829024120.GM8424@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Matthew Dennis wrote:
> The cases about taking a string and sending it via execute don't seem to fit
> here for 1) cases where it is impossible to track the dependencies can be
> trivially constructed and 2) the very nature of the execute statement makes
> it obvious that it I shouldn't expect it to be tracked. Poor Analogy: In C,
> if foo calls bar and I remove bar I expect the compiler to tell me. If
> elsewhere in my code, I construct a memory address of where I believe bar
> should be and execute it I have no expectations for the compiler to tell me
> bar was removed.
The analogy is poor, yes. A better analogy is the use of dlopen() on a
library. If the library is not present at run time, the compiler will
not tell you anything.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2008-08-29 04:16:20 | Re: WAL archiving to network drive |
Previous Message | Matthew Dennis | 2008-08-29 02:37:29 | Re: indexes on functions and create or replace function |