From: | Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Carol Walter <walterc(at)indiana(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 32 to 64 bit change over |
Date: | 2008-08-26 19:17:50 |
Message-ID: | 20080826121750.79df32aa@jd-laptop |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:13:27 -0400
Carol Walter <walterc(at)indiana(dot)edu> wrote:
> Greetings, one and all,
>
> I have some very large memory bound queries being run in postgres.
> The documentation seems to say that I would be able to get more use
> out of the available memory if I were running the 64 bit postgres
> instead of the current 32 bit. We have the binaries for both. What
> would be the ramifications to changing from the 32 bit to the 64 bit
> process?
You have to dump and reload or use something like Slony to transfer
your data to the new cluster.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Thanks,
> Carol
>
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Carol Walter | 2008-08-26 19:20:13 | Re: vacuum verbose relations reporting |
Previous Message | Carol Walter | 2008-08-26 19:13:27 | 32 to 64 bit change over |