Re: AT TIME ZONE and DST in UTC<->CET conversion

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jaromír Talíř <jaromir(dot)talir(at)nic(dot)cz>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: AT TIME ZONE and DST in UTC<->CET conversion
Date: 2008-08-22 18:00:52
Message-ID: 200808221800.m7MI0qh12202@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
> Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > ISTM this is the one that's wrong. "CET" is standard time, it, GMT+1.
>
> > If you want a timezone which switches between CET and CST automatically you
> > should use something like Europe/Paris.
>
> Well, actually he *is* using such a zone:
>
> regression=# select * from pg_timezone_names where name = 'CET';
> name | abbrev | utc_offset | is_dst
> ------+--------+------------+--------
> CET | CEST | 02:00:00 | t
> (1 row)
>
> But
>
> regression=# select * from pg_timezone_abbrevs where abbrev = 'CET';
> abbrev | utc_offset | is_dst
> --------+------------+--------
> CET | 01:00:00 | f
> (1 row)
>
> The problem is that one of these two statements is using the abbrev
> meaning and the other is using the timezone meaning.
>
> We don't have much control over the zone definition, so I'm thinking
> maybe the abbrev should be removed from the tznames lists. But that
> seems a bit sucky too. Does anyone have any idea if the zic folk would
> be responsive to a complaint that defining a timezone with the same
> name as an abbreviation is a bad idea?

Is this a TODO?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message c k 2008-08-22 18:02:00 Auto recovery feature
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-08-22 16:42:42 Re: [GENERAL] Surprising syntax error