From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dan Kaminsky <dan(at)doxpara(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #4340: SECURITY: Is SSL Doing Anything? |
Date: | 2008-08-20 15:26:45 |
Message-ID: | 200808201526.m7KFQjF17193@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> >> The code is there, actually, it's just #ifdef NOT_USED :-) From a *long*
> >> time ago, and the commit message just says "silence compiler warnings",
> >> so I've not managed to figure out why...
> >
> > I think the commit you're looking for is this one:
> >
> > 2002-09-26 00:41 momjian
> >
> > * doc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml, src/backend/libpq/be-secure.c,
> > src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure.c: Allow SSL to work withouth
> > client-side certificate infrastructure.
> >
> > so you'd probably need to root around in the archives from around then
> > to see why this was considered a good idea.
>
> No, that's not the one. It's the one after that one, at:
>
> http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure.c.diff?r1=1.14;r2=1.15
>
> In general, that code needs a look-over, I think. There may be more
> changes required.
I found the reason for the patch; the SSL guy at that time, "Bear",
disappeared, and our code required SSL certificates at that point, so I
removed the requrement:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-09/msg01522.php
I will work with Magnus on cleaning this up.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-08-20 15:38:23 | Re: BUG #4340: SECURITY: Is SSL Doing Anything? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-08-20 14:52:13 | Re: BUG #4340: SECURITY: Is SSL Doing Anything? |