Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf
Date: 2008-08-20 03:19:27
Message-ID: 200808200319.m7K3JRl06756@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> > I'd still like to see us adopt the proposal from some time ago where
> > we stop commenting out the parameters at all, but short of that,
> > hiding options seems about the worst choice we could make.
>
> Well, there seems to be a very substantial body of opinion that says
> we *do* need to hide "uninteresting" options. How many are
> "interesting" is certainly open to debate, but as far as I can tell
> most people think it's a short list, not "all of them".
>
> In short, you're in the minority.

On idea is for postgresql.conf to merely include other files:

include 'sharedmem.conf'
include 'compat.conf'
...

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-08-20 03:32:34 Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-08-20 03:14:02 age(xid) function bug