From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Asko Oja <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com>, Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |
Date: | 2008-08-19 15:57:43 |
Message-ID: | 200808191757.46259.dfontaine@hi-media.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Le mardi 19 août 2008, Tom Lane a écrit :
> For the same reasons that plan invalidation itself was a new feature
> and not a bug fix;
I'm sorry but that doesn't help me a dime to understand current situation. It
could well be just me, but... here's how I see it:
- plan invalidation is a new feature in 8.3
- previous releases are out of business: new feature against stable code
- now, we have found a bug in plan invalidation
- HEAD (to be 8.4) will get some new code to fix it
But 8.3 won't benefit from this bugfix? On the grounds that the feature which
is now deployed on the field should *maybe* not get used the way it *is*?
Sorry again, I really don't get it.
--
dim
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua Drake | 2008-08-19 16:01:33 | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |
Previous Message | Joshua Drake | 2008-08-19 15:51:50 | Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf |