| From: | "Mike Gould" <mgould(at)allcoast(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Fw: UUID vs Serial or BigSerial |
| Date: | 2008-08-18 18:25:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20080818182538.4b5dc9c2@mail.allcoast.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
All,
>From a performance standpoint what is the downside to using a UUID column? Our current database with 25 locations after 5 years is only about 2.5 gig. We do about 200,000 orders per year so we are not getting hit with a huge amount
of data. Much of our data is static or once it has been processed it is static from that point forward. The only reason that I was thinking about using a UUID data type is that this is a commerical product and we are also looking to move into
the ASP space. It is possible that we might have 2 companies merge and I thought that using the UUID would cause less hassles if we had to merge 2 databases. That being said the changes of that happening are pretty slim. I've got one
DBA telling me that I should be using a UUID datatype for all of our tables.
Best Regards,
Michael Gould, Manager Information Technology
All Coast Intermodal Services, Inc.
First Coast Intermodal Services, Inc.
First Coast Logistics Services, LLC.
904-226-0978
904-592-5250 fax
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ivan Sergio Borgonovo | 2008-08-18 19:08:37 | on cascade delete performances, transaction and set constraints deferred |
| Previous Message | Francisco Figueiredo Jr. | 2008-08-18 17:47:30 | Re: Postres.exe Processes Hang |