Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Asko Oja <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com>, Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
Date: 2008-08-18 09:00:57
Message-ID: 200808181100.57433.dfontaine@hi-media.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

Le lundi 18 août 2008, Andrew Dunstan a écrit :
> > On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 09:40:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> This is not the kind of patch we put into stable branches.
>
> So what? That is not the only criterion for backpatching.

I fail to understand why this problem is not qualified as a bug.

Regards,
--
dim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2008-08-18 09:02:37 Re: IN vs EXISTS equivalence
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-08-18 08:57:07 Re: Automatic Client Failover