| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [Q] DNS(bind) ER model |
| Date: | 2008-08-15 13:46:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20080815134600.GB82656@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:26:54AM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
> Have you looked at mydns? It is a database driven DNS server - and it
> works just fine with Postgresql.
Given that the references section of its documentation doesn't include
a number of important RFCs, are you quite sure it's really a complete
DNS server? (Note that I haven't tested it, so I'm asking in genuine
ignorance. But the lack of a reference to RFC 2671, which defines
EDNS0, sure doesn't give me warm fuzzies. If you're deploying a name
server today and it doesn't support EDNS0, it's possible you're going
to find that some users can't resolve your names in the near future.)
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Otto | 2008-08-15 13:57:28 | Re: Update taking forever |
| Previous Message | Gauthier, Dave | 2008-08-15 13:43:49 | Killing active users |