Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jan Urbański <j(dot)urbanski(at)students(dot)mimuw(dot)edu(dot)pl>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2
Date: 2008-08-14 22:05:59
Message-ID: 20080814220559.GJ4232@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Urbański wrote:

> Yeah, I got that idea, but then I thought the chances of touching the
> same element during binary search twice were very small. Especially now
> when the detoasting occurs only when we hit a text Datum that has the
> same length as the sought lexeme.
> Still, I can do it if people feel like it.

Actually, in that light it sounds pretty useless.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Decibel! 2008-08-14 22:37:07 Re: SeqScan costs
Previous Message Jan Urbański 2008-08-14 21:42:38 Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2