Re: Using PK value as a String

From: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>
To: Moritz Onken <onken(at)houseofdesign(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using PK value as a String
Date: 2008-08-12 15:21:36
Message-ID: 20080812112136.72af4bff.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

In response to Moritz Onken <onken(at)houseofdesign(dot)de>:

>
> Am 12.08.2008 um 17:04 schrieb Bill Moran:
>
> > In response to Moritz Onken <onken(at)houseofdesign(dot)de>:
> >
> >> We chose UUID as PK because there is still some information in an
> >> integer key.
> >> You can see if a user has registered before someone else (user1.id <
> >> user2.id)
> >> or you can see how many new users registered in a specific period of
> >> time
> >> (compare the id of the newest user to the id a week ago). This is
> >> information
> >> which is in some cases critical.
> >
> > So you're accidentally storing critical information in magic values
> > instead of storing it explicitly?
> >
> > Good luck with that.
>
> How do I store critical information? I was just saying that it easy
> to get some information out of a primary key which is an incrementing
> integer. And it makes sense, in some rare cases, to have a PK which
> is some kind of random like UUIDs where you cannot guess the next value.

I just repeated your words. Read above "this is information which is in
some cases critical."

If I misunderstood, then I misunderstood.

--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/

wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Moritz Onken 2008-08-12 15:24:50 Re: Using PK value as a String
Previous Message Moritz Onken 2008-08-12 15:10:24 Re: Using PK value as a String