From: | felix(at)crowfix(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: DELETE with JOIN |
Date: | 2008-08-08 03:54:31 |
Message-ID: | 20080808035431.GA11774@crowfix.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 10:55:17PM -0400, Joe wrote:
> I recall a similar problem ages ago and IIRC it was due to Oracle's locking
> configuration, i.e., some parameter had to be increased and the instance
> restarted so it could handle the transaction (or it had to be done in
> chunks).
I gather that the general consensus is that Oracle and Postgresql are
different enough that I will have to figure them out independently. I
have found that Postgresql is more tolerant of operator ignorance, so
I had hoped that any Oracle solution would work elsewhere, but maybe
not.
Thanks for the helpful responses.
--
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix(at)crowfix(dot)com
GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Fenbers | 2008-08-08 19:02:45 | vacuum in single-user mode |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-08-08 00:45:13 | Re: DELETE with JOIN |