| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Mini improvement: statement_cost_limit |
| Date: | 2008-08-04 21:12:17 |
| Message-ID: | 200808041712.17627.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday 04 August 2008 16:49:43 Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 14:35 -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> > On Monday 04 August 2008 03:50:40 daveg wrote:
> >
> > And you'll note, I specifically said that a crude tool is better than
> > nothing. But your completely ignoring that a crude tool can often
> > end-up as a foot-gun once relased into the wild.
>
> The proposal is for an option with no consequences when turned off. We
> respect your right not to use it. What is the danger exactly?
>
All of the proposals I have seen for adding query hints would also have no
consequence if not used, but no one seems to care about that argument.
:-)
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2008-08-04 21:17:59 | Re: Automatic Client Failover |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-08-04 21:08:36 | Automatic Client Failover |