Re: Is autovacuum doing a wraparound-avoiding VACUUM?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is autovacuum doing a wraparound-avoiding VACUUM?
Date: 2008-07-21 15:28:30
Message-ID: 20080721152830.GF5842@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Simon Riggs wrote:

> On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 01:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I agree, this is important for visibility into what's happening.
> > The string isn't getting translated so I don't see any big downside
> > to applying the patch in back branches.
>
> Patches for 8.3 and CVS HEAD.

Applied, thanks.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-07-21 15:38:04 Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-07-21 15:19:40 Re: pg_dump additional options for performance