Re: pg_dump additional options for performance

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 09:18:29PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Simon Riggs (simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 17:43 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > Even this doesn't cover everything though- it's too focused on tables
> > > and data loading. Where do functions go? What about types?
> >
> > Yes, it is focused on tables and data loading. What about
> > functions/types? No relevance here.
>
> I don't see how they're not relevant, it's not like they're being
> excluded and in fact they show up in the pre-load output. Heck, even if
> they *were* excluded, that should be made clear in the documentation
> (either be an explicit include list, or saying they're excluded).
>
> Part of what's driving this is making sure we have a plan for future
> objects and where they'll go. Perhaps it would be enough to just say
> "pre-load is everything in the schema, except things which are faster
> done in bulk (eg: indexes, keys)". I don't think it's right to say
> pre-load is "only object definitions required to load data" when it
> includes functions and ACLs though.
>
> Hopefully my suggestion and these comments will get us to a happy
> middle-ground.

One observation, indexes should be built right after the table data
is loaded for each table, this way, the index build gets a hot cache
for the table data instead of having to re-read it later as we do now.

-dg

--
David Gould daveg(at)sonic(dot)net 510 536 1443 510 282 0869
If simplicity worked, the world would be overrun with insects.