Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Kless <jonas(dot)esp(at)googlemail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type
Date: 2008-07-14 08:34:28
Message-ID: 20080714083428.GB4777@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 01:04:33AM -0700, Kless wrote:
> I am not in favor of adding more database-specific types to ANY
> database
> - and I think PostGres doing it was a mistake.

So you think that adding full text indexing, gist/gin indexes, text,
geometric types should have waited until the SQL standard specified
them? With that kind of thinking we'd still be in the database stone
age.

One of postgresql's greatest strengths is user-defined types, lets use
it.

> If there is a demand for it, then it should be added to the SQL
> standard. That is the correct way to propose a change. That's why
> there are standards.

You are ofcourse free to propose it to them, but the question is if
they'd listen...

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Please line up in a tree and maintain the heap invariant while
> boarding. Thank you for flying nlogn airlines.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2008-07-14 12:38:30 Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
Previous Message Kless 2008-07-14 08:04:33 Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type