Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements
Date: 2008-07-07 13:45:33
Message-ID: 20080707134533.GB21091@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> Sync with current CVS HEAD and post in hackers- too because patches-
> close to the closing.
>
> http://www.sigaev.ru/misc/multicolumn_gin-0.3.gz

I looked this over and it looks good in general. I was only wondering
about for single-column indexes -- we're storing attribute numbers too,
right? Would it be too difficult to strip them out in that case?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bernd Helmle 2008-07-07 13:46:38 Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output
Previous Message Bernd Helmle 2008-07-07 13:20:49 Missing descriptions for aggregates

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2008-07-07 13:58:17 Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements
Previous Message Yoshiyuki Asaba 2008-07-07 07:22:21 Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP