From: | "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Command execution |
Date: | 2008-07-03 13:22:50 |
Message-ID: | 20080703132250.GH8169@a-kretschmer.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
am Thu, dem 03.07.2008, um 23:15:33 +1000 mailte Aaron Spiteri folgendes:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have been following the mailing list and reading the source code
> for a little while, and was wandering if someone could fill in the
> gaps for me. Does PostgresQL view updates and inserts performed in a
> function as part of the same transaction or are they considered
> separate transactions:
>
> For instance say I had a function name foo and ran the command:
>
> SELECT foo();
>
> Inside foo there was a INSERT and UPDATE, and the INSERT failed but
> the UPDATE succeeded would the UPDATE be rolled back?
The whole function is an own transaction. Fails the INSERT, the complete
function foo failed. In other words; yes, also the UPDATE rolled back.
Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
GnuPG-ID: 0x3FFF606C, privat 0x7F4584DA http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-07-03 13:24:06 | Re: Resolving polymorphic functions with relateddatatypes |
Previous Message | Aaron Spiteri | 2008-07-03 13:15:33 | Command execution |