From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Does anything dump per-database config settings? (was Re: ALTER DATABASE vs pg_dump) |
Date: | 2008-06-30 02:47:03 |
Message-ID: | 200806292247.03492.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 27 June 2008 12:58:41 Richard Huxton wrote:
> Richard Huxton wrote:
> > Richard Huxton wrote:
> >> At present it means you can't reliably do:
> >> DROP DATABASE foo;
> >> pg_restore --create foo.dump
> >> I'd then have to either hand edit the dumpall dump or wade through a
> >> bunch of errors checking that none of them were relevant.
> >
> > Actually, I'm not sure pg_dumpall does them either.
>
> [snip]
>
> > Am I doing something stupid here?
>
> OK - so to get the ALTER DATABASE commands I need to dump the schema for
> the entire cluster. Is that really desired behaviour?
>
Certainly not desired by a number of people I have talked to, but I don't have
much hope in seeing the behavoir change... perhaps someday if we get around
to merging pg_dump and pg_dumpall....
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-06-30 03:30:08 | Re: Does anything dump per-database config settings? (was Re: ALTER DATABASE vs pg_dump) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-06-29 20:57:10 | WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing |