| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | clefis(at)gmx(dot)de, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #4266: regress test: could not dump unrecognized node type: 925 |
| Date: | 2008-06-26 21:13:04 |
| Message-ID: | 200806262113.m5QLD4B29573@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Clemens A. Fischer" <clefis(at)gmx(dot)de> writes:
> > here is a part of the output of the regression test:
> > WARNING: could not dump unrecognized node type: 925
> > DEBUG: parse tree:
> > DETAIL: {QUERY :commandType 5 :querySource 0 :canSetTag
> > true :utilityStmt {CREATESTMT
>
> Oh, you've got debug_print_parse turned on. I'm not especially excited
> about trying to make the regression tests pass under random nondefault
> settings --- we could expend large amounts of effort that way, to very
> little purpose.
But doesn't the failure indicate a potential problem that the regression
tests are pointing out?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-06-26 21:20:03 | Re: BUG #4266: regress test: could not dump unrecognized node type: 925 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-06-26 21:10:01 | Re: BUG #4266: regress test: could not dump unrecognized node type: 925 |