Re: limits?

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Kynn Jones" <kynnjo(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Steve Atkins" <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>
Subject: Re: limits?
Date: 2008-06-26 03:07:17
Message-ID: 200806252307.17749.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Monday 23 June 2008 15:45:22 Kynn Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com> wrote:
> > In real use you're unlikely to hit any limits, theoretical or practical,
> > but if you start to use a silly number of tables and so on you're likely
> > to hit performance issues eventually. I'm not sure where that threshold
> > would be, but it's higher than "thousands".
>
> Actually, the DB I have in mind would certainly be approaching "silly
> territory." I'm looking at a schema with around 10 thousand tables (or
> views). Unfortunately, as far as I can tell,
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/ says nothing about maximum number of
> tables. I suppose I could always find what this limit is "the hard way",
> by writing a script that just keeps creating empty tables and see where
> that goes, but I'd prefer not to do something like this...
>

http://people.planetpostgresql.org/greg/index.php?/archives/37-The-million-table-challenge.html

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-06-26 03:17:37 Re: IF ROW( NEW ) <> ROW( OLD )
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-06-26 02:56:10 Re: what are rules for?