| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
| Subject: | Re: archives.postgresql.org not responding |
| Date: | 2008-06-22 21:43:13 |
| Message-ID: | 200806221743.13537.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Sunday 22 June 2008 02:45:07 Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> >> Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> I've been seeing connection timeouts for the last little while ...
> >>
> >> AFAIK - currently there is maintainance work going on at the CMD hosting
> >> facility besides archives also search,planet and the buildfarm are down
> >> currently ...
> >
> > Longer than expected, but everything should be up but buildfarm. I am
> > out of caffeine at this point but will look at buildfarm first thing in
> > the morning.
>
> Fully understand about lack of caffeine --- but if this was a planned
> service outage, some advance notice to pgsql-www would've been
> appropriate, no? Or did I just miss it?
>
He sent notice to sysadmins, but not pgsql-www. I'm not sure what the policy
is, but seems like it might be good to send these outage notices to a more
public list as well. (For example, there is currently a notice from Marc
about doing maintanance on mail.postgresql.org which I believe was supposed
to happen last night, though we haven't recieved a followup mail yet)
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2008-06-22 22:05:21 | Re: archives.postgresql.org not responding |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-06-22 19:43:18 | Re: archives.postgresql.org not responding |