Re: array column and b-tree index allowing only 8191 bytes

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Celso Pinto <cpinto(at)yimports(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: array column and b-tree index allowing only 8191 bytes
Date: 2008-06-12 13:32:23
Message-ID: 20080612133223.GA5534@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Celso Pinto wrote:

> What, if any, would be the recommended options to improve this
> scenario? Not using intarray? :-)

Not using a broken design. Arrays are a poor fit in the relational model.
Avoid them.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message luca.ciciriello 2008-06-12 13:37:28 defining a variable
Previous Message iztech 2008-06-12 13:31:35 file system level backup