Re: 8.3.1 vs 8.2.X on HP-UX PA-RISC 11.11/11.23

From: Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>
To: Josh Rovero <rovero(at)sonalysts(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.3.1 vs 8.2.X on HP-UX PA-RISC 11.11/11.23
Date: 2008-06-12 12:28:03
Message-ID: 20080612122803.GO337@it.is.rice.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Are you using the same locales for both?

Ken

On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 09:40:20PM -0400, Josh Rovero wrote:
> We run GCC-compiled postgresql on a number
> of HP-UX and Linux boxes.
>
> Our measurements to date show 8.3.1
> performance to be about 30% *worse*
> than 8.2 on HP-UX for the same "drink the firehose"
> insert/update/delete benchmarks. Linux
> performance is fine.
>
> Tweaking the new 8.3.1 synchronous_commit
> and bg writer delays that *should* speed
> things up actually makes them a bit worse,
> again only on HP-UX PA-RISK 11.11 and 11.23.
>
> Right now it's 32 bit, both for 8.2 and 8.3.
>
> Any hints?
>
>
>
> P. J. Rovero
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Rovero 2008-06-12 12:54:27 Re: 8.3.1 vs 8.2.X on HP-UX PA-RISC 11.11/11.23
Previous Message Josh Rovero 2008-06-12 01:40:20 8.3.1 vs 8.2.X on HP-UX PA-RISC 11.11/11.23