From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2008-06-10 01:49:52 |
Message-ID: | 20080610014952.GF10034@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Agreed. I realize why we are not zeroing those bytes (for performance),
> but can't we have the archiver zero those bytes before calling the
> 'archive_command'?
Perhaps make the zeroing user-settable.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-06-10 01:50:58 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-06-10 01:46:06 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-06-10 01:50:58 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-06-10 01:46:06 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |