| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Overhauling GUCS |
| Date: | 2008-06-06 20:53:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20080606205355.GE16502@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Treat wrote:
> One idea I have been kicking around is having every guc have a anchor in the
> website (rahter than anchoring on parameter family). It might be enough to
> just populate the search bot with every guc anchored to family though...
+1 on the anchor per variable.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2008-06-06 21:01:06 | Re: New DTrace probes proposal |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2008-06-06 20:30:33 | Re: Overhauling GUCS |