Re: why so many open files?

From: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: why so many open files?
Date: 2008-06-02 13:45:27
Message-ID: 20080602134527.GA27579@depesz.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 09:38:29AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> That's not very surprising at all: a backend might have to write out a
> dirty buffer in order to reclaim the buffer for re-use, and which
> database the page is from doesn't enter into that.
> What does seem surprising is that it's had to do that quite a lot.
> Is this an old PG version without a bgwriter process? In a properly
> functioning recent release, I'd expect only the bgwriter to have a
> really eclectic mix of open files.

# select version();
version
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 8.2.7 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)
(1 row)

# select name, setting from pg_settings where name ~ 'bgw';
name | setting
-----------------------+---------
bgwriter_all_maxpages | 5
bgwriter_all_percent | 0.333
bgwriter_delay | 200
bgwriter_lru_maxpages | 5
bgwriter_lru_percent | 1
(5 rows)

should i show any more information?

regards,

depesz

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-06-02 13:57:17 Re: Question about cost-calculation
Previous Message Brian A. Seklecki 2008-06-02 13:41:19 Re: [Xen-users] SNMP AgentX subagent for Xen