Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

From: Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Date: 2008-05-30 14:19:00
Message-ID: 20080530161900.074f218d@iridium.wars-nicht.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 29 May 2008 23:02:56 -0400 Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> Well, yes, but you do know about archive_timeout, right? No need to wait
> 2 hours.

Then you ship 16 MB binary stuff every 30 second or every minute but
you only have some kbyte real data in the logfile. This must be taken
into account, especially if you ship the logfile over the internet
(means: no high-speed connection, maybe even pay-per-traffic) to the
slave.

Kind regards

--
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
German PostgreSQL User Group

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum 2008-05-30 14:26:53 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Previous Message Marko Kreen 2008-05-30 13:31:06 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2008-05-30 14:20:44 Re: Initial max_connections for initdb on FreeBSD.
Previous Message Marko Kreen 2008-05-30 13:31:06 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL